
The SpringBoard of my iPod Touch 2G. Theme is "Icarus" by ispazio.
First of all, I’d like to say that I opened this blog for the sole purpose of posting this entry. The iPod Touch 2G jailbreak is upon us. For the past year, the iPhone Dev Team has been a major fixation of my interests. On Saturday, I woke up, checked their blog, and found that they had made their newest move. The iPod Touch 2G jailbreak was finally released after months of waiting with no news.
The news was bittersweet, though, because this round you have to have your iPod plugged in and a few command-line processes running to even reboot your device. The Dev Team has gotten a lot of crap for this, but it’s something they are trying to fix. It’s not the flamers on ipodtouchfans that grind my gears, and it isn’t the bad attitude of the Dev Team in recent months that piss me off. There is another group of people that make me even angrier.
This morning I took a look at TUAW, where Christina Warren had given her input on the developments of late. Christina said what I expected she would say. This release was a bit too difficult for her, and she planned on waiting for a non-tethered release. She says that she is “not convinced that anything available via jailbreak is worth risking [her] $400 investment.” I get that. I’m kind of tech enthusiast/nerd, so DFU mode and terminal commands do not scare me. I spent the time and effort and had many terrifying moments, and I get that most people don’t want to do that. What I do not understand is the response of the commenters on her article.
“Why?! Is there ANY advantage to taking your touch off the grid? This counterculture BS makes no sense!” said David. “All this jailbreak stuff is non-news. It’s like taking a new car and removing everything that you need to pass inspection – what is the point?” he said in a later comment. After reading a few more comments and inspecting the Digg entry on the release, I was throughly angered by commenters and forum users who think that jailbreaking is either related to cracking and illegal activities or completely useless an not newsworthy. Many commenters believe that Apple blogs shouldn’t write about the jailbreak because it is not Apple news. My comment, in reply to David and his ilk read as such:
Just because some people don’t understand tinkering, doesn’t mean that those of us that like it should be flamed. Just like some people sit in their garage for hours on end tuning their car to no end, there are those of us that like to do fun things with our technology. We are the kind of people that like to run Linux on anything we obtain, theme every piece of technology we own, and swoon over a new package manager release. This is an Apple blog, and when important news about Apple technology (whether official or not) comes around, someone is bound to write about it.
Sans my bad grammar, that is exactly how I feel. I don’t get the anger people feel towards jailbreakers. If they don’t like what a blog reports on, then they should not be reading it. What doesn’t help, either, is Christina’s next article. One of the worst moves you can make after causing an uproar with an article about a jailbreak is write an article about a jailbreak app that lets you pirate legitimate iPhone software. It’s news, but at least pass it off to another writer. It was interesting article, if I am going to be honest, but it was not the right time and place to write it.
Don’t get me wrong. I love TUAW, and Chrstina Warren is my favorite TUAW blogger. I just have to notice the blatantly inappropriate placement of two very well-written articles. We tinkerers already get enough trouble from Apple proper. The last thing we need is the Apple cult crying “Crucify!”